The month of January presents opportunities to not only consider the year ahead, but also look back at the year just passed. With this in mind, we wanted to take a look at our most popular blogs from 2011. As you’ll see, most of them merit revisiting as your practice plans for the future.
The New Year always brings new challenges for healthcare organizations, and 2012 is no exception. Case-in-point: The transition to 5010 is already testing the financial health of practices—and that only took effect on January 1.
While much of the 5010 transition seems to have progressed smoothly, it’s imperative that practices across the nation carefully monitor their cash flow and bottom line throughout the year to make sure that this trend continues. Spikes in rejections and denials, for instance, can be the first warning signs of problems—and may or may not be related to the 5010 transition.
28 Nov 2011 Keith Grone 0 Comments
Keeping on top of your revenue cycle is not a once-a-week or twice-a-week job. Every day, practices should enter charges, submit claims, and work any rejections and denials. The
more attention these various efforts get, the faster your practice will get paid.
Setting expectations is the key—especially in a busy office with so many other pressing duties to attend to. The only way to ensure a constant flow of revenue is to set expectations for physicians, coders, and billing staff regarding timeliness and efficiency.
For a long time, the practice I work at – North Platte Nebraska Physician Group – used a clearinghouse that made us feel as if we were sending claims into thin air. Although we were sending claims electronically, we never knew where they were in the processing cycle. Too often, we found ourselves bumped up against timely filing limits that hurt our reimbursement.
So we searched for a new clearinghouse that would provide the tools and the customer service we needed to improve our financial picture. After an in-depth review of our options, we selected an Internet-based organization for its terrific customer service, plain English reporting, and easy ability to view claims all the way through the revenue cycle. This new system has helped cut our timely filing reductions, decrease the number of duplicate claims, and improve our accounts receivable (A/R) tremendously.
22 Sep 2011 Ginny Shipp 0 Comments
After 18 years managing all aspects of the revenue cycle within the healthcare industry, I’ve noticed many practices often submit claims to insurance companies only to later receive a denial because they didn’t include a key element that the payer requires—an element they didn’t even know had to be included. In frustration, the practice fixes the issue and resubmits the claim, then moves on to the next claim. This effort costs valuable time and delays cash flow. But what have they learned?
The key to effective cash flow is to really manage denials, not just resubmit claims. In today’s healthcare environment, it’s important for practices to avoid examples such as the one above by taking just a little time to understand claims processes from the payers’ perspective. After all, payers don’t decide the care a patient should receive. Their role is simply to: 1) identify what they will reimburse, and 2) set guidelines for how they will reimburse.
As manager of collections and reimbursement for Radiation Oncology Services of America (ROSA, Inc.), I am constantly thinking about ways to enhance the collections process and speed up reimbursement. Although there are many good practices worth considering when trying to improve the reimbursement process, the following are a few I’ve found to be most beneficial:
When a claim is denied, one of the first questions you should ask yourself is whether prior authorization was obtained for the services listed on the claim. If the answer to this question is “yes,” then you have to dig deeper to determine why it was denied—and how to prevent such denials in the future.
Unfortunately, claims with prior authorizations are denied more often than you might think. There are five common reasons for these denials that you should take into account and ways to avoid them:
26 Aug 2011 Gina Hayes 0 Comments
As the Business Office Manager for an orthopedic practice that sends out 650-700 claims a day, I rely on my clearinghouse to support efficient and accurate revenue cycle processes. There are 23 physicians, 12 physician assistants, and 15 therapists at Orthopaedic Specialists of the Carolinas—and we’re growing. We need tools as dynamic as our practice.
That’s one reason why, in January 2008, we transitioned from our former traditional clearinghouse to a web-based clearinghouse solution. We’ve found some distinct advantages.
21 Jul 2011 Craig Bridge 0 Comments
The concept of performance measurement isn’t new, but it’s gaining more attention as the healthcare field strives to improve both quality and efficiency. Your practice’s revenue cycle is a prime target for performance measurement because it can help you understand your financial strengths and weaknesses, and design effective improvement strategies.
But where do you begin? Over the years, I have found it particularly helpful to share four key metrics with staff members. You and your staff should not only be aware of these essential benchmarks, but regularly review and use them to structure improvement activities:
In today’s complex world of healthcare billing, practices can make some common—yet costly—errors that lead to incorrect billing, denied claims, and lost revenue. The good news is that many of these mistakes are avoidable with some adjustments to process, approach, and training.
Mistake 1: Incorrect data on the front end. This error often involves inaccurate patient demographic/insurance information or invalid insurance coverage. The main culprit: lack of verification. The best way to avoid this type of mistake is training, training, and more training! Staff responsible for patient check-in should be educated on the importance of collecting appropriate information and verifying insurance, as well as specific steps to accomplish these tasks. (Ideally, these processes should occur before the date of service to identify potential problems early, and to ensure patients understand their fiscal responsibilities.)
