The Medical Practice Management Association® (MGMA®) just wrapped up its annual conference with record attendance last week. As I participated in the meeting, I was struck by the diversity of the audience. While the more traditional attendees from large practices were present, the meeting also appeared to draw quite a few smaller practices this year, such as those in the one-to-three provider range.
That probably shouldn’t be surprising. Many vendors are seeing an uptick in the number of small practices now embracing and adopting electronic health records (EHRs), and MGMA presents a logical place to gain information, network with other providers, and learn how to address common implementation stumbling blocks. Basically, MGMA has the playbook on how to implement this type of technology, and smaller practices as well as newer ones can benefit from this knowledge.
This is the first in a series of articles that will answer some commonly asked questions about different aspects of the revenue cycle.
Today, more than ever, practices are focusing on ensuring they have a strong revenue cycle – this includes making sure denials are minimized and appealed when appropriate. Today, we are answering some of the most commonly asked questions about denied claims and the appeals process:
Last week I had the pleasure of attending an industry event in Atlanta, where practice administrators and physicians gathered to discuss best practices and success stories for using clearinghouse services as well as other practice management technology. On Thursday afternoon I was able to sit in on a panel discussion where four speakers from four different practices talked specifically about their experiences with clearinghouses. During the session, each panelist focused on how their clearinghouse helped their practice enhance workflow and increase profitability.
During the hour long event, I noticed that all four of the panelists mentioned that they had leveraged elements of their clearinghouse to support growth without the need to hire additional staff. One person even mentioned that her practice now includes 28 physicians after merging with another group—but she works with the same six billers she worked with prior to the merger.
7 Apr 2011 Jim Denny 0 Comments
We are happy to announce the launch of a new website – ICD-10 Hub – which is part of a new partnership between Navicure and AAPC. The purpose of the site is to provide all medical practices with helpful information and in-depth resources to assist with the 5010 and ICD-10 transitions. ICD-10 Hub will compliment and bolster the practice management information you already receive on this blog.
Devoted to helping every practice successfully move to 5010 and ICD-10, ICD-10 Hub allows you to download webinars, read blogs and catch up on the latest news the industry has to offer. Some of the content currently available includes:
30 Jun 2010 Jim Denny 0 Comments
The prospect of obtaining stimulus funding has, not surprisingly, created an environment of intense focus on Electronic Health Records (EHRs). While that’s OK, I see a distinct limitation in looking at EHRs, practice management systems (PMS) and other applications as isolated pieces of hardware/software. Instead, I think the current atmosphere provides many practices the opportunity to step into completely new systems, with a completely new way of viewing the components. 
Rather than contemplating an EHR purchase or PMS evaluation in the context of “what’s available,” consider how well these technologies will serve as your platform from which to custom-build, taking into account future needs as well as current ones.
You’ve probably heard it before, but it is worth reiterating: Start preparing to transition to ICD-10 now. Most experts believe, with good reason, that the 2013 deadline will not be delayed. Those who are not prepared to correctly submit ICD-10 codes on the implementation date simply will not get paid.
The magnitude of the change is no small matter, either. The roughly 14,000 now-familiar ICD-9-CM codes will be replaced by about 69,000 ICD-10-CM codes; the current 4,000 or so ICD-9-PCS codes will swell to about 72,000 ICD-10-PCS codes. In all settings, physicians will need to provide much more explicit documentation.
We now have our first look at the official shape “meaningful use” of electronic health record (EHR) technology will likely take – in the near future, at least. As many had anticipated, one of the principal underlying themes is interoperability.
The long-anticipated proposed rule defining meaningful use finally was released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on Dec. 30. On the same day, we also received the interim final rule setting initial EHR technology standards, implementation specifications and certification criteria from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC).
You can view both rules in the Jan. 13, 2010, Federal Register at http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a100113c.html.
